Examining Gender Disparities in the Assessment of Territorially Organized Communities in the Framework of Neuroscience

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.4/510

Keywords:

Gender differences, self-actualization, rural territory, rural communities, rural development

Abstract

Gender difference is an actual problem of gender differentiation, traditional cultural restrictions potential depending on gender, health status, understanding and creating conditions for maximum self-realization and disclosure of girls' abilities. The purpose is to research and analyze the characteristics of the manifestation of gender differences in the population's desire for self-realization and rural development. The research methodology is generalization, analysis of the results of scientific research on the specified problem. The study highlights the main, most significant differences in the perception of problems and prospects of rural development from the point of view of gender. The specifics of gender type in self-perception, self-realization, self-actualization, self-improvement are considered; the results of the research, the study of the opinion of the villagers regarding the actual issues of the activity and development of the community. The analysis of the research results proved the impact of gender differences on the determination of priority spheres of society's life and the readiness to actively participate in their implementation, which once again confirms the need to take into account gender characteristics in the strategy of village development and to define gender heterogeneity as an aspect of neuropsychology. The article reveals the definitions of the concepts "gender", "gender approach" from the point of view of representatives of various scientific areas: philosophy, psychology, neuropedagogy. The importance of the implementation of the gender approach for the modern education system is revealed, which allows us to think about the need to apply the gender approach as an integral element of the organization of the educational process.

Author Biographies

  • Nadiia Pylypenko, Sumy National Agrarian University, Ukraine

    PhD of Science in Economics
    Associate Professor
    Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship
    Sumy National Agrarian University, Ukraine

  • Viacheslav Pylypenko, Sumy National Agrarian University, Ukraine

    PhD of Science in Economics
    Professor of the Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship
    Sumy National Agrarian University, Ukraine

  • Volodymyr Zablotskyi, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Ukraine

    Doctor of Science in State Administration
    Professor of the Department of Civil Service and Management of Educational and Social Institutions
    Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Ukraine

  • Tetiana Sych, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Ukraine

    Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences
    Professor of the Department of Public Service and Management of Educational and Social Institutions
    Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Ukraine

  • Olga Saienko, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Ukraine

    PhD in Economics
    Associate Professor
    Department of Public Service and Management of Educational and Social Institutions
    Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Ukraine

  • Olga Ptakhina, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Ukraine

    PhD of Pedagogical Sciences
    Associate Professor
    Department of Public Service and Management of Educational and Social Institutions
    Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Ukraine

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29

Issue

Section

Articles (Peer Reviewed)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 508

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.