Integrating Neurotechnology and AI for Psychiatric Aggression Management: A Paradigm Shift in Clinical and Educational Frameworks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70594/brain/16.S1/25

Keywords:

psychiatric aggression, neurobiology, artificial intelligence, predictive analytics, patient autonomy, ethics in psychiatry, public perception

Abstract

Aggression in psychiatric patients presents a significant challenge in mental healthcare, necessitating an interdisciplinary approach that integrates neuroscience, artificial intelligence (AI), and ethical considerations. Traditional management strategies often rely on restrictive interventions, raising ethical concerns regarding patient autonomy and therapeutic efficacy. Recent advancements in neuroimaging and AI-driven behavioural analytics offer the potential to transition from reactive to predictive and preventative approaches. However, while these innovations hold promise for individualised interventions and real-time risk assessment, they also introduce critical ethical concerns, including algorithmic bias, data privacy, misclassification risks, and patient autonomy violations. This study critically examines the neurobiological underpinnings of aggression, focusing on dysfunctions in the prefrontal cortex, amygdala hyperactivity, neurotransmitter imbalances, and neuroinflammation, while evaluating AI-based predictive models in psychiatric aggression management. Additionally, the ethical and legal frameworks surrounding AI in psychiatry are discussed, with a focus on bias-mitigation strategies, transparency in AI decision-making, and informed consent challenges. The study also explores practical pathways for integrating AI into psychiatric care workflows, outlining future directions for clinical research and policy development. By merging neuroscientific insights, AI innovations, and ethical frameworks, this study advocates for a patient-centered, technology-assisted aggression management approach that balances predictive analytics with human oversight and ethical accountability.

Author Biographies

  • Elena-Rodica Popescu, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

    Department of Psychiatry
    Faculty of Medicine
    Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
    Socola Institute of Psychiatry, Iasi, Romania

  • Bianca Augusta Oroian, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

    Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

  • Alin Ciobica, Apollonia University, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University & Romanian Academy, Iasi, Romania

    Ioan Haulica Institute, Apollonia University, Iasi, Romania
    Department of Biology
    Faculty of Biology
    Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania.
    CENEMED Platform for Interdisciplinary Research
    Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, Romania
    Center of Biomedical Research
    Romanian Academy, Iasi, Romania

  • Andreea Szalontay, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

    Department of Psychiatry
    Faculty of Medicine
    Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
    Socola Institute of Psychiatry, Iasi, Romania

  • Roxana Chiriță, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

    Department of Psychiatry
    Faculty of Medicine
    Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
    Socola Institute of Psychiatry, Iasi, Romania

Published

2025-07-29

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 589

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.